Timeline for Which software can batch calculate weighted SNR of recordings?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 26 at 21:50 | answer | added | Sam Lapp | timeline score: 1 | |
| Jan 6, 2023 at 17:04 | history | edited | Ulf Elman | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 61 characters in body
|
| Dec 20, 2022 at 10:34 | comment | added | Ulf Elman | The end result is intended to be a quantitative value representing sound quality as percived by a human listener. The sound recording is left unchanged by the quality assessment. The filtering process is used only during the quality calculation process. | |
| Dec 19, 2022 at 21:53 | comment | added | selene | @WMXZ agreed with your point of discussion. @ Ulf does your question specifically require that human weighting function or does it not necessarily depend on the type of weighting function to be applied through a batch process? | |
| Dec 19, 2022 at 6:54 | comment | added | WMXZ | I would be curious to know why one wanted to modify animal sound with a human weighting function. Human weighting is NOT objective assessment but subjective (i.e. human related) | |
| Dec 18, 2022 at 19:11 | history | asked | Ulf Elman | CC BY-SA 4.0 |