Skip to main content
added 29 characters in body
Source Link
WMXZ
  • 7.6k
  • 1
  • 10
  • 35

In cases where the sound pressure varies in phase with the velocity of the medium (water/sand) the sound pressure is proportional to the particle velocity (far field condition). See this question discussion and for the formula to estimate particle velocity from sound pressure.

Measuring directly the particle velocity in water is much more difficult than in air, for which some instruments seem to be commercially available (see external links in this wikipedia artcle) that are measure the particle motion via the cooling effect of air motion.

The alternative method to transduce motion directly to electricity uses magnets and is implemented in geophones which are the basic components of ocean bottom seismometers (OBS) used by major research institution for seismic research and placed on the sea bottom. Geophones are however limited to low frequencies (couple of tens of Hz). OBS were found useful to also record sound of low frequency baleen whales.

Most commercially available acoustic vector sensors (AVS) use accelerometers to measure the particle acceleration and particle velocity is obtained by integration. Their frequency response is wider than the one of geophones but still are limited to a couple of kHz.

As particle acceleration is proportional to the sound pressure gradient, accelerometers can be replaced by pairs of closely spaced hydrophones. The bandwidth for this type of particle velocity estimation is limited by the hydrophone spacing, the closer the hydrophone, the wider the bandwidth.

However, in contrast to accelerometers, hydrophones are still useful for higher frequencies forming a sparse hydrophone array.

Measuring directly the particle displacement (e.g. Laser vibration sensor) is not practical in water.

In cases where the sound pressure varies in phase with the velocity of the medium (water/sand) the sound pressure is proportional to the particle velocity (far field condition). See this question discussion and for the formula to estimate particle velocity from sound pressure.

Measuring directly the particle velocity in water is much more difficult than in air, for which some instruments seem to be commercially available (see external links in this wikipedia artcle) that are measure the particle motion via the cooling effect of air motion.

The alternative method to transduce motion directly to electricity uses magnets and is implemented in geophones which are the basic components of ocean bottom seismometers (OBS) used by major research institution for seismic research. Geophones are however limited to low frequencies (couple of tens of Hz). OBS were found useful to also record sound of low frequency baleen whales.

Most commercially available acoustic vector sensors (AVS) use accelerometers to measure the particle acceleration and particle velocity is obtained by integration. Their frequency response is wider than the one of geophones but still are limited to a couple of kHz.

As particle acceleration is proportional to the sound pressure gradient, accelerometers can be replaced by pairs of closely spaced hydrophones. The bandwidth for this type of particle velocity estimation is limited by the hydrophone spacing, the closer the hydrophone, the wider the bandwidth.

However, in contrast to accelerometers, hydrophones are still useful for higher frequencies forming a sparse hydrophone array.

Measuring directly the particle displacement (e.g. Laser vibration sensor) is not practical in water.

In cases where the sound pressure varies in phase with the velocity of the medium (water/sand) the sound pressure is proportional to the particle velocity (far field condition). See this question discussion and for the formula to estimate particle velocity from sound pressure.

Measuring directly the particle velocity in water is much more difficult than in air, for which some instruments seem to be commercially available (see external links in this wikipedia artcle) that are measure the particle motion via the cooling effect of air motion.

The alternative method to transduce motion directly to electricity uses magnets and is implemented in geophones which are the basic components of ocean bottom seismometers (OBS) used by major research institution for seismic research and placed on the sea bottom. Geophones are however limited to low frequencies (couple of tens of Hz). OBS were found useful to also record sound of low frequency baleen whales.

Most commercially available acoustic vector sensors (AVS) use accelerometers to measure the particle acceleration and particle velocity is obtained by integration. Their frequency response is wider than the one of geophones but still are limited to a couple of kHz.

As particle acceleration is proportional to the sound pressure gradient, accelerometers can be replaced by pairs of closely spaced hydrophones. The bandwidth for this type of particle velocity estimation is limited by the hydrophone spacing, the closer the hydrophone, the wider the bandwidth.

However, in contrast to accelerometers, hydrophones are still useful for higher frequencies forming a sparse hydrophone array.

Measuring directly the particle displacement (e.g. Laser vibration sensor) is not practical in water.

added 22 characters in body
Source Link
WMXZ
  • 7.6k
  • 1
  • 10
  • 35

In cases where the sound pressure varies in phase with the velocity of the medium (water/sand) the sound pressure is proportional to the particle velocity (far field condition). See this question discussion and for the formula to estimate particle velocity from sound pressure.

Measuring directly the particle velocity in water is much more difficult than in air, for which some instruments seem to be commercially available (see external links in this wikipedia artcle) that are measure the particle motion via the cooling effect of air motion.

The alternative method to transduce motion directly to electricity uses magnets and is implemented in geophones which are the basic components of ocean bottom seismometers (OBS) used by major research institution for seismic research. Geophones are however limited to low frequencies (couple of tens of Hz). OBS were found useful to also record sound of low frequency baleen whales.

Most commercially available acoustic vector sensors (AVS) use accelerometers to measure the particle acceleration and particle velocity is obtained by integration. Their frequency response is wider than the one of geophones but still are limited to a couple of kHz.

As particle acceleration is proportional to the sound pressure gradient, accelerometers can be replaced by pairs of closely spaced hydrophones. The bandwidth for this type of particle velocity estimation is limited by the hydrophone spacing, the closer the hydrophone, the wider the bandwidth.

However, in contrast to accelerometers, hydrophones are still useful for higher frequencies forming a sparse hydrophone array.

Measuring directly the particle displacement (e.g. Laser vibration sensor) is not practical in water.

In cases where the sound pressure varies in phase with the velocity of the medium (water/sand) the sound pressure is proportional to the particle velocity. See this question discussion and for the formula to estimate particle velocity from sound pressure.

Measuring directly the particle velocity in water is much more difficult than in air, for which some instruments seem to be commercially available (see external links in this wikipedia artcle) that are measure the particle motion via the cooling effect of air motion.

The alternative method to transduce motion directly to electricity uses magnets and is implemented in geophones which are the basic components of ocean bottom seismometers (OBS) used by major research institution for seismic research. Geophones are however limited to low frequencies (couple of tens of Hz). OBS were found useful to also record sound of low frequency baleen whales.

Most commercially available acoustic vector sensors (AVS) use accelerometers to measure the particle acceleration and particle velocity is obtained by integration. Their frequency response is wider than the one of geophones but still are limited to a couple of kHz.

As particle acceleration is proportional to the sound pressure gradient, accelerometers can be replaced by pairs of closely spaced hydrophones. The bandwidth for this type of particle velocity estimation is limited by the hydrophone spacing, the closer the hydrophone, the wider the bandwidth.

However, in contrast to accelerometers, hydrophones are still useful for higher frequencies forming a sparse hydrophone array.

Measuring directly the particle displacement (e.g. Laser vibration sensor) is not practical in water.

In cases where the sound pressure varies in phase with the velocity of the medium (water/sand) the sound pressure is proportional to the particle velocity (far field condition). See this question discussion and for the formula to estimate particle velocity from sound pressure.

Measuring directly the particle velocity in water is much more difficult than in air, for which some instruments seem to be commercially available (see external links in this wikipedia artcle) that are measure the particle motion via the cooling effect of air motion.

The alternative method to transduce motion directly to electricity uses magnets and is implemented in geophones which are the basic components of ocean bottom seismometers (OBS) used by major research institution for seismic research. Geophones are however limited to low frequencies (couple of tens of Hz). OBS were found useful to also record sound of low frequency baleen whales.

Most commercially available acoustic vector sensors (AVS) use accelerometers to measure the particle acceleration and particle velocity is obtained by integration. Their frequency response is wider than the one of geophones but still are limited to a couple of kHz.

As particle acceleration is proportional to the sound pressure gradient, accelerometers can be replaced by pairs of closely spaced hydrophones. The bandwidth for this type of particle velocity estimation is limited by the hydrophone spacing, the closer the hydrophone, the wider the bandwidth.

However, in contrast to accelerometers, hydrophones are still useful for higher frequencies forming a sparse hydrophone array.

Measuring directly the particle displacement (e.g. Laser vibration sensor) is not practical in water.

Source Link
WMXZ
  • 7.6k
  • 1
  • 10
  • 35

In cases where the sound pressure varies in phase with the velocity of the medium (water/sand) the sound pressure is proportional to the particle velocity. See this question discussion and for the formula to estimate particle velocity from sound pressure.

Measuring directly the particle velocity in water is much more difficult than in air, for which some instruments seem to be commercially available (see external links in this wikipedia artcle) that are measure the particle motion via the cooling effect of air motion.

The alternative method to transduce motion directly to electricity uses magnets and is implemented in geophones which are the basic components of ocean bottom seismometers (OBS) used by major research institution for seismic research. Geophones are however limited to low frequencies (couple of tens of Hz). OBS were found useful to also record sound of low frequency baleen whales.

Most commercially available acoustic vector sensors (AVS) use accelerometers to measure the particle acceleration and particle velocity is obtained by integration. Their frequency response is wider than the one of geophones but still are limited to a couple of kHz.

As particle acceleration is proportional to the sound pressure gradient, accelerometers can be replaced by pairs of closely spaced hydrophones. The bandwidth for this type of particle velocity estimation is limited by the hydrophone spacing, the closer the hydrophone, the wider the bandwidth.

However, in contrast to accelerometers, hydrophones are still useful for higher frequencies forming a sparse hydrophone array.

Measuring directly the particle displacement (e.g. Laser vibration sensor) is not practical in water.